Login | Signup

Apple's New Toy: iGlad or iSad?

Matt Gardner
apple, Indie Games, iPad

Apple's New Toy: iGlad or iSad?

So it begins: louder than rolling thunder and more unstoppable than a fat man sat in a tank, the Apple hype engine has started up again. It all happened on Wednesday when the media went wild over the assertion that 'an announcement was about to be made', and the world held its breath. Indie games developers giggled excitedly and bookstore managers cried nervously. What would they revolutionise this time? What ergonomic wonders would the design teams at Apple - fed only on smoothies made from blended Converse hi-tops, skinny jeans and Brylcreem - pull out of the hat?

The answer, ladies and gentlemen, is the iPad. You can find out all sorts of hardware stuff and read Apple's gushing blurb here, but I'll attempt to summarise a bit anyway. Essentially an iPhone after growth hormones, the half inch thick iPad comes stuffed with a 1GHz Apple A4 chip and boasts 16GB to 64GB of flash storage, along with all of the capabilities of its smaller sibling but with a much grander 9.7 inch screen.

After reading up on it quite a bit, we figured we'd speculate on the new tablet's five best and worst points, and what this might mean for us gamers.

The Good

  1. It's Bigger: As the unfortunate bedroom quote goes, 'Size matters'. The iPad is altogether more pleasing because now even those with the fattest of fingers can double-tap their way to browsing ecstasy. It's also good for the eyes and will mean less squinting when you're reading books on it and laughing at just how underdeveloped the Amazon Kindle is in comparison.
  2. It's A Media Masterpiece: Apple are good at what they do, and what they do is take your basic media concerns and let you interact with them in cool and funky ways. Whatever your media - music, photos, video - the iPad caters for it impressively. Most appealing though, must be the virtual reader. As mentioned above, Amazon must be spitting teeth at just how much money they're going to lose over the neanderthal Kindle. Buttons? Monochrome colours? No way to drink a virtual pint? Pah! The iPad laughs in the face of such things.
  3. Apps: Being larger, more powerful, but still including all of the iPhone's old tricks, the potential of apps just got even better. Indie developers are already peeing themselves with excitement at what the iPad could mean for casual gaming, with huge possibilities opening for things such as multitouch musical composition, large touchscreen family boardgames, and it's only a matter of time before 'Hand Twister' makes an appearance surely. This could also mean a whole new approach to multiplayer gaming as the screen is comfortably big enough for two, with the return, perhaps, of games that used to be played on those classic low arcade tables. Imagine it: you can play locally with a mate, and face one another at the same time. You can hear what a bunch of indie devs think by clicking here.
  4. It'll Be Pretty Cheap....ish: The iPad is retailing Stateside for prices from$499 to $829, depending on the amount of flash memory you want, which will probably mean a starting price point of £350 or so over here, though you'll have to shell out more for 3G. But that's really not bad for a tablet at all.
  5. It's Sexy: Look at it. It manages to succeed  at doing something women have been trying to perfect for centuries: be slim and curvy at the same time. On top of that, it also proves that it certainly is hip to be square (Huey Lewis), and that you've got the touch (Stan Bush). I'll stop now.

Apple's New Toy: iGlad or iSad?

The Bad

  1. No Camera: I can understand leaving out a dedicated rear camera, there'd be absolutely no point on something of this size; but no camera at all, not even a built in webcam? Come on people, you're supposed to be innovators! It's a shame too because this would be an awesome way to Skype your buddies, and for grooming fanatics it would have made a pretty sweet mirror.
  2. No  OS X and No Doodling: This is worse, though. The limitations of the iPhone are now the limitations of the iPad, and because the latter is bigger, those limitations are much more noticeable. Apple didn't do themselves any favours against the haters chanting 'well isn't it just a massive iPhone?' by not supporting OS X on the iPad. A portable, multitouch OS X would have been awesome. On top of this, there's no handwriting recognition which would surely have been a no-brainer on a tablet of this size. How are bored people at work or in lectures supposed to doodle mindlessly on this, dammit?!
  3. No Flash: Being a site run by gamers, for gamers, we take our gaming pretty seriously. Do we appreciate the iPad's lack of Flash support? No we do not, quite simply because some of the best games for killing ten minutes in a soul-sapping meeting or on the loo are to be found online! We love Flash. Flash is awesome. Give us our Flash back! Flash!.....AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH! Nuff said.
  4. The Battery: I'm hugely sceptical when it comes to Apple's batteries. The fact that you can't remove them worries me, and indeed as I found with my iPod, they have a rage-inducing tendency of going kaput merely seconds after the warranty has expired. Apple have said that the iPad will support up to 10 hours of use. This made me laugh so hard I almost choked on my own tears of mirth.
  5. Do We Even Need It?: The iPad's launch video showed Steve Jobs lounging around a sofa, checking his email and pontificating about the ease of its use. But I can happily do that with either my phone or my laptop. In fact, I'd rather do it with my phone or my laptop. The iPad won't fit into my pocket, and I can't do anywhere near as many things with the iPad as I can do with Mr. Lappy. The pitch has been built around this mystical 'third market' somewhere in between the smartphone and the laptop, but I'm not sure that the iPad does enough more than the smartphone to warrant that. As a gamer it's another a medium in which to spend my money, but I have a smartphone, a PSP and a DS for portability, and a PC and a console for bigger things. In all honesty, I'm not entirely sure where this would fit into my life.

What do you think? What's your take on Apple's newest plaything? Give us your opinions below in the comments box.

Whichever side of the divide you fall on, one thing is for certain. Over 50% of the inhabitants of California will own one within a month of its release. I bet the Beckhams have four already.

Add a comment12 comments
Rod  Jan. 29, 2010 at 10:37

I agree with most of your points, but the one that really strikes a chord with me is the second bad one. No handwriting? Can you imagine the digital artist market that would have opened up if they had allowed you to hook it up to your PC and use it as a graphical tablet?

I'm also not convinced about the need for it. I have a colleague who's planning to buy it, and when I asked him "what'll you be using it for?" he simply had no answer.

Apple, I am disappoint.

MrRobin  Jan. 29, 2010 at 11:12

No flash??!! This is the first time I've heard of this. This is a ridiculous ommission by Apple and I have gone from being very interested to not at all because of this.

Jobs touted the iPad as the best browsing experience you'll ever have. Only on sites that have no flash, he means. That would be umm, about 10.

Loopy  Jan. 29, 2010 at 11:46

Im neither right now, i dont own it, so im not in a place to comment on it too much.

Although will say that you have to look at it for what it is, its a media tablet...it does not promise to feed the hungry or solve all the other world problems.

It does not have a phone, because its not designed to be or replace a phone, its too big and people will still be carrying their phone with them, so its pointless making it one.
It does not have flash or a usb, again lik the air argument its because both are becoming obsolete. Most of the people arguing about these are people who dont like change.

People have to accept apple design for the future not the past, that is why i buy apple because it pushes me to change my veiwing, computing, habits for the better. I do not buy because its pretty or im a slave to apple, im not that daft.

My only crit is the asthetic design, i do feel if they are just trying to bridge the gap between phone and comp they should have come up with a whole new deisgn, as it does look like an oversize iphone, giving the wrong impression of what the product actually is.

Jacko  Jan. 29, 2010 at 12:06

It looks interesting, but I would like to see some real tests with indie games before I buy it.

Pornmoose  Jan. 29, 2010 at 12:25

yup - looks like a big giant i-Phone for those who want to pretend to be teeny-tiny hobbits.

I love that you too call him Mr Lappy - i thought i was the only one. :)

Ginger  Jan. 29, 2010 at 14:15

It doesn't have a USB but its great for photos! Don't worry you can buy a camera connector. Why would Apple make you do that? Just a minute, I know......

politicianinthemaking  Jan. 29, 2010 at 14:20

I think people are being too generous in comparing to the iphone - it should be called the ipod touch XL, which is what it is. The ipadded cell is also closer to the mark. This is a device developed for and possibly, with the help of the big 5 record labels to sell content. I'd bet the price is someway subsidised by them.

Its designed to consume protected content and allow better methods of paying for content. Content is designed to move to and from the device via designated channels, ie. big business.

The whole point of the device is to make purchase easier than piracy. Its an interesting direction, because in the future these type of device might get an ISO international standard granted, and Governments could prevent ISPs from connecting any other devices to Internet, to reduce piracy.

Matt Gardner  Jan. 29, 2010 at 14:42

I was really hoping that it would have interactive graphical capabilities. It could have been so good if they'd just gone with OS X rather than the the absurdly restrictive operating system jacked from the iPod touch and iPhone.

From a gaming perspective, it would have been sweet to have seen the logical evolution of games like Scribblenauts on something like this. But no. Cheers Apple.

I still want an iPhone though.

EndlessWaves  Jan. 30, 2010 at 19:27

Even if I agree with your assessment about what the future holds (which I don't) it still makes no sense. Flash and USB may be going obsolete but the iPad doesn't support any of their possible replacements or any nicely integrated expansion slots. It's not so much a case of designing for the future as being laughed at in both the present and the future because it doesn't support common formats now and can't have support for future formats added when they materialise.

EndlessWaves  Jan. 30, 2010 at 19:44

Some of your good points don't make much sense.

2. Media Masterpiece? Have you looked at the supported formats list? It doesn't even support VC-1 which is used for blu-ray so it's hardly obscure. And the description only lists one speaker, so playback will be mono even if it's decently loud and good quality which is no guarantee.

3. Apps? If you want applications you'll just get a netbook, which will blow anything a phone app store offers out of the water.

4. Cheap? Hardly, similar multimedia tablets like those from archos cost ~£150-200 and even a tablet netbook is a similar price to the entry level iPads.

Like a lot of Apple's stuff, it's a wonderful device for getting people with low requirements to pay lots of money but neither good value for money nor possessed of the flexibility serious users will want.

John McLaggan  Feb. 5, 2010 at 11:51

EndlessWaves - you beat me to it, the media support is actually very poor and it only sports a mono speaker. I didn't think it was cheap at all compared to rivals and it's already doing serious damage to the fledgling e-book market as two publishers have now updated their prices 50% and forced Amazon to do the same.


Gary  Feb. 13, 2010 at 17:23


Not as catchy as iPad... stick with iPad

Email Address:

You don't need an account to comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.