Login | Signup

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

Author:
David Brown
Category:
Reviews
Tags:
Danger Close Games, DICE, EA, FPS games, Games reviews, Medal Of Honor

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

Platforms: PC (version tested) | Xbox 360 | PlayStation 3

Developer: Danger Close Games | DICE (multiplayer)

Publisher: EA

Six hours, it says. That's how long it took to complete Medal of Honor, the latest game out that attempts to familiarise you with the world of Tangos going down, CASEVACS being en-route and targets needing painting with soft lambs. Or is that LAM? Can't find it anywhere online, but I'm sure that's what I heard. It's all just so confusing,  even assuming you already know what all this military bollocks is. I know fire, I know what it means when they say 'evac', but the rest of it is a blur.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

Independent thought isn't required in Medal of Honor though, so there's no need to worry. Do what the big boss man says, go to your location and shoot some ethnic freedom fighters/terrorists. This review is primarily focusing on the single player element, with multiplayer discussed in brief at the end. If you want a more detailed breakdown of the online elements, shout about it in the comments and we'll get on the case. For now, we're on our own, as it were.

MoH is your standard shooty bang-bang affair and that's no understatement. It wouldn't be an exaggeration to claim there's not a single element of the offline element that hasn't been directly copied or lifted from, I don't know, say, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare. A name randomly picked out of the hat there. This is in equal measures bad and good, the former because you've got the constant feeling you've done it all before, a number of times. That's because you have. That feeling's there for a reason.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

The latter is because Modern Warfare and it's sequel aren't bad games, so if you're going to copy something, at least copy something successful and good. It even improves on the comically hole-ridden and fragmented storyline of the second game, managing to both make sense in general and keep things ticking over. Variety is provided by switching you from Spec Ops missions through helicopter gunship on-rails sections back through US Rangers bits, all of which are extensive enough to allow you to get into them, but never too long that they outstay their welcome or become tedious. Essentially, in the broadest and most simplistic terms, if you've played a CoD or a MoH game in the past, chances are you'll get on with this.

But here's why you might not. First of all, as mentioned, it is so similar to games past that it's like playing an expansion to Modern Warfare. If you got fed up of that, or you just wanted something with even a hint of ambition, this is to be avoided like the plague. It offers barely anything approaching the word new and this point deserves to be stressed. If you're bored of modern military combat games with an arcade-y bent, run away now.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

While taking, er, 'inspiration' from CoD is one thing, making the same mistakes is unacceptable. Like its rival series, you are the sole focus of the story, which is fine, but not to the extent that nothing happens without you moving forward. There's less of that feeling that nobody is killing anything but you, but quick glances at your team and you'll find them 'simulating' combat more often than not. At one point, an elite spec ops veteran was standing near me, firing calmly into the burned-out tank he was sheltering behind. If I hadn't moved forward, he'd have continued to do this.

It's easy to miss this sort of thing, but once you've spotted it, it's hard to ignore. Exploring downstairs after I'd been told to go up a level, I was therefore not triggering the next phase of the level. When I finally did move forward, I noticed a group of enemy soldiers standing next to my motionless colleagues. They then all tumbled to the ground dead, struck by an airborne virus, no doubt. Not shot, just dying because they were meant to be killed by my team as we all ascended together. Except we didn't, so the game got confused.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

There's also the issue of jingoism. Perhaps for those of us not living in the US, it's more obvious and more offensive, but the game, set in a non-fictional conflict, is way too one-sided in its depiction of the conflict. By choosing to go 'real world', it's harder to justify continuously calling the enemy “mother fuckers” and other things like that. Not that we're expecting the game to be 'nice', but it just goes a bit too far sometimes. Might be worth bearing in mind.

It's also perplexing how many enemies you have to take down. Yes, a game with few enemies to shoot might be less epic and exciting, but it seems like you've ploughed your way through the entire population of Afghanistan by the end of the game. If the Taliban had this many soldiers, RPGs and vehicles in just one small area of the country, no wonder the 'war' is still going on. It's all a bit like just playing Duck Hunt on the NES – enemies pop up from the same places, you gun them down easily (at least, you do on PC, there's no comment to be made on how well this works on console with pads) and then you wait until the next lot appear. You just don't get to use a light gun and hear quacking noises.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

The overall Medal of Honor package is a base one, reasonable yet uninspired action with exactly the same problems as games that have come before, but with a slightly disturbing aggressive nationalist edge and a more sensible storyline than its main rival. But there are so many little problems that pile on top of one another. While the variety of levels is decent, there are too many on-rails sections. You get infinite ammo pistols that you never, ever have to use (until one bit where your other guns are taken away) and secondary weapons that aren't sniper rifles are all unnecessary as well. I never once used the shotgun, for example. You get nigh-on infinite ammo for your M4 or whatever, so why bother with the others? Just go up to your buddy, press the corresponding button and there, refilled. Only once do they claim to be out of ammo, a scripted moment where you probably don't need to refill your supplies anyway, unless you're an atrocious shot.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

The level of scripting gets in the way of actually playing the game as well, on occasion. If you're not in the exact right place, nothing will happen. At one point, I was supposed to take out a camp with a sniper rifle, but I was a few centimetres off the prescribed spot, so nothing happened. I was told to wait, so I did, but I wasn't waiting in the right spot. After a minute or so, my companion growled at me to get moving, I shuffled forward a tiny bit, and there, triggered. Hmm.

A lot of issues then, but before we go, multiplayer. It's a bit like a cut-down Bad Company 2, which is unsurprising as it comes from DICE, creators of said game. The levels are expansive and one of the best things about the game, but there are less classes, you have less ability to customise and are restricted to merely tweaking each of the standard three, rather than being able to create your own. There's no kill cam, either, which doesn't help much on such huge maps where the inevitable sniper bastards will be lurking.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

Multiplayer won't hold the attention as much as Bad Company 2's does, and it's been (obviously) done before, but it's OK. Nothing special, just OK. Just like the single player, in fact. You won't necessarily be disappointed by Medal of Honor. You just won't be impressed.

Pros:

  • Reasonable shooting action
  • Tries to provide variety
  • Decent but not spectacular multiplayer

Cons:

  • CoD clone, right down to the flaws and plentiful little niggling issues
  • Way too scripted
  • Ultra-nationalism might make some uneasy

The Short Version: If you like playing the same game you've played twenty times before, by all means fire Medal of Honor up. It'll satisfy you completely. Just make sure you turn your brain off and you'll do fine. If it's on, the cracks immediately appear.

Medal of Honor Review: Bringing A Tier To The Eye

Add a comment6 comments
zax  Oct. 17, 2010 at 14:57

BC2 and MOH are both COD clones!

Btw, the poster guy with beard is more suited to being a fat guy riding a hartley in US!

dave  Oct. 17, 2010 at 15:07

medal of honor came first so your comment stinks of fail

Dave Brown  Oct. 17, 2010 at 16:08

The Medal of Honor SERIES came first, this is a reboot and an unoriginal one at that.

ODB  Oct. 18, 2010 at 09:35

agree with Dave....and WTF is a HARTLEY??? Obvo dont get the point of a Tier 1 do ya sunshine?

schnide  Nov. 10, 2010 at 13:26

I don't know what game it is that everyone's playing not to like it. Okay, it's relatively short and there are bugs - but damn, while it lasts, it's fantastic. You can't concieve how many Taliban fighters there are in the real world? Who do you think the Western soldiers are fighting out there - thin air?

This is, for all my very limited knowledge of what war is really like, the closest that any game has come. It gives you a real sense of camaraderie and also nicely ties the storylines of the different people you play all together - more so than Modern Warfare 2 ever did.

The game is not perfect but I defy you to play the chopper level and not be impressed by what you're looking at, or to feel the sheer terror when you're holed up in the building near the Shahikot mountains thinking you're going to get overwhelmed.

It's a great, great game. Thanks EA!

David Brown  Dec. 26, 2010 at 22:06

Cobblers to all that, to be honest. If MOH was accurate and there were that many Taliban fighters on ONE mountain alone, it'd be like World War II in Afghanistan.

Email Address:

You don't need an account to comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.