Login | Signup

Sledgehammer must reinvent Call Of Duty this year, or blow their golden opportunity

Author:
Jonathan Lester
Category:
News
Tags:
Activision, Call Of Duty, Sledgehammer Games

Sledgehammer must reinvent Call Of Duty this year, or blow their golden opportunity

Franchise Enters Three-Yearly Rotation

Call Of Duty is no longer a two-horse race. After assisting Infinity Ward and Treyarch from behind the scenes for years, Sledgehammer Games are finally getting their chance to prove their mettle, and will be fully responsible for developing this year's Call Of Duty.

It's high time that the franchise received some fresh blood, and hopefully Sledgehammer might be able inject new life into the series - an opportunity that Ghosts never managed to capitalise on.

Mind you, a renewed "focus on DLC and micro DLC" might raise a few eyebrows. Click below, crank up the Peter Gabriel and let's take a closer look at how they can accomplish their new mission... so long as they're brave enough to do so.

Announcing the news in a recent investor call, Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshbirg pointed out that this new three-year rotation will give each game more time to refine their mechanics and quality. "There are several advantages to doing this," he said. "This first is of course quality; this will give our designers more time to envision and to innovate for each title."

Hooray!

"Simultaneously it will give our content creators more focus on DLC and micro DLC which, as you know, have become large and high-margin opportunities, and significant engagement drivers."

BoooOOOooo.

"Finally, it'll give our teams more time to polish, making sure that we relive the best possible experience to our fans each and every time."

Hooray again!

Sledgehammer must reinvent Call Of Duty this year, or blow their golden opportunity

Be in no doubt: this is a fantastic decision. Accusations of stagnation are levelled against Call Of Duty on a daily basis, due mainly to the bi-yearly release cycle, meaning that throwing a new studio in the mix should be a perfect opportunity to force franchise detractors to eat their words.

However, Sledgehammer will need to seize this opportunity with both hands if they want to really make a difference and push Call Of Duty forward. In effect, they need to reinvent Call Of Duty by bringing something fresh and new to the table. Ghosts should have done just that, as the first game on next-gen platforms, but it trod water and caught a fair bit of flack in the process.

As I see it, there are two ways that they can fulfil their new mandate.

Sledgehammer must reinvent Call Of Duty this year, or blow their golden opportunity

First off, seeing as Sledgehammer were rumoured to be working on a Sci-Fi action adventure title, they're be well-placed to take Call Of Duty in an exciting new direction. A futuristic setting brings scope for wildly new guns, new faces, new set pieces and most importantly of all new mechanics to the table; perhaps making more of Ghost's space sections that were so sadly under-utilised. There's nothing to stop Treyarch and Infinity Ward from returning to type later on; maybe it's time to push the boat out and demonstrate that Activision can handle real innovation.

Or, perhaps, pulling things back might be the right way to go. The original Modern Warfare was so superb because it felt raw, plausible and down-to-Earth, but each successive entry tried to be bigger and brasher, ultimately leading to the unintentional self-parodies of MW3 and Ghosts. The set pieces kept getting more ridiculous and frequent, yet progressively less impactful. Sledgehammer Games could easily strip back the bluster and bombast to focus on gritty, real warfare, while providing opportunities for more freeform stealth and even squad tactics. With Rainbow Six: Patriots still KIA, there's a gap in the market for a more tactical approach to triple-A shooting.

Sledgehammer must reinvent Call Of Duty this year, or blow their golden opportunity

More of this please.

Oh, and a brand new engine probably couldn't hurt.

Either way, we hope that Sledgehammer live up to their name, and go in all guns blazing. Call Of Duty is crying out for brave new ideas and fresh thinking - while maintaining the multiplayer as the hectic, ridiculous, wonderful thing it has always been.

Though if the worst comes to the worst, we've always got Treyarch to fall back on.

Add a comment4 comments
Tsung  Feb. 7, 2014 at 14:41

Lets really push the boat out..

"I don't know what kind of weapons will be used in the third world war, assuming there will be a third world war. But I can tell you what the fourth world war will be fought with -- stone clubs."

Call of Duty World War 4, stone club edition.

DivideByZero  Feb. 7, 2014 at 14:46

Stone clubs would work for me, but they need to sort the f***ing lag and lag-comp out. End of story.

Do what they want with the graphics, do what they want with the level design - but they had better do something better with gaming performance that Ghosts and Blops2.

JonLester  Feb. 7, 2014 at 14:49

Lets really push the boat out..

"I don't know what kind of weapons will be used in the third world war, assuming there will be a third world war. But I can tell you what the fourth world war will be fought with -- stone clubs."

Call of Duty World War 4, stone club edition.


A stone sledgehammer, surely?

http://www.dealspwn.com/writer/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Im-so-sorry.jpg

I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. Things tend to get a little weird on a Friday afternoon.

In all seriousness, I'd kinda be up for a low-tech CoD - maybe one that goes back to historical settings?

EDIT: What the hell, let's go for broke. It's horribly rushed MS Paint banner time!

Last edited by JonLester, Feb. 7, 2014 at 15:10
Late  Feb. 7, 2014 at 15:24

I really didn't need that image, Jon! :{ X)

If they went all stone-age I'd still be constantly quickscoped, but by some **** with a catapult/slingshot.

Fingers crossed for something new, though. Infinity Ward have been pretty bad in recent years (coinciding with West, Zampella, et al leaving) and whilst Treyarch's efforts have been better they've certainly not been ground breaking by any stretch of the imagination.

Email Address:

You don't need an account to comment. Just enter your email address. We'll keep it private.